Which legal ruling established the doctrine that segregation was permissible if facilities were equal?

Prepare for the Maryland Comprehensive Assessment Program (MCAP) Test. Use our multiple choice questions and flashcards to understand MCAP terms deeply. Hints and explanations are available for each question to help you succeed. Start your journey to test readiness today!

Multiple Choice

Which legal ruling established the doctrine that segregation was permissible if facilities were equal?

Explanation:
The idea being tested is the creation of a legal standard that allowed segregation as long as the facilities were equal. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) established this by ruling that state laws requiring separate facilities for Black and white people were constitutional if the separate facilities were equal in quality. This “separate but equal” justification became the basis for Jim Crow laws for decades, even though in reality the facilities and opportunities offered to Black Americans were far from equal. Brown v. Board of Education later overturned this doctrine, declaring that separate facilities are inherently unequal and therefore unconstitutional in public education. The other two cases differ in topic and outcome: Dred Scott concerned citizenship and slavery in new lands, and Korematsu dealt with wartime internment during World War II, not with segregation in public facilities.

The idea being tested is the creation of a legal standard that allowed segregation as long as the facilities were equal. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) established this by ruling that state laws requiring separate facilities for Black and white people were constitutional if the separate facilities were equal in quality. This “separate but equal” justification became the basis for Jim Crow laws for decades, even though in reality the facilities and opportunities offered to Black Americans were far from equal.

Brown v. Board of Education later overturned this doctrine, declaring that separate facilities are inherently unequal and therefore unconstitutional in public education. The other two cases differ in topic and outcome: Dred Scott concerned citizenship and slavery in new lands, and Korematsu dealt with wartime internment during World War II, not with segregation in public facilities.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy